Psychz Networks vs Liquid Web

비교 옵션	3.4 2 리뷰 Psychz Networks 방문	4.5 169 리뷰 Liquid Web 방문
요금제	11 호스팅 플랜	13 호스팅 플랜
시작가	₩31,160 / 월	₩17,750 / 월
무료 도메인	아니요	예
쿠폰	아니요	아니요
사용자 평점	3.4	4.5
신뢰도	3.0	4.6
요금제	4.5	4.4
사용자 친화성	3.0	4.6
기술 지원	3.0	4.5
기능	3.5	4.6
사용자 리뷰	2 리뷰	169 리뷰
최근의 긍정적인 리뷰	No reviews yet	Liquid Web Hosting Review John M Lynn, 2021. 6. 30. 10 I moved from a Fantastic Web Company, that was bought out by one of the LARGE hosting companies. Then the nightmare began. Unfortunately, I was spoiled with VERY good customer support with my old hosting provider. After 4 ... 더 많이 보기 attempts of transitioning 30,000 web pages built in Moveable Type and $5000 later, I finally found Liquid Web. Thank God! These guys are fantastic! I've called several times in the middle of the night, and a LIVE person picked up the phone that I could understand. When I say 24 hour support, it's not some stupid chat AI robot, or out-sourced company. I'm was SHOCKED! Not only do you get a LIVE person, you can someone that has a 'brain' in regards to complex questions. I've since transition our website to using Word Press, which is one of the worlds best Blog Management products. No doubt in my mind, that Liquid Web provides the BEST support for Word Press installation. I'm running our website on on the of their managed servers. Please note: This is not a cheapy $10 hosting web hosting product. They offer fully hosted managed 24 hour support. In my opinion, the pricing is VERY competitive. If I could give more stars, I would. No complaints. 더 적게 보기
최근의 부정적인 리뷰	An utterly disappointing experience with DDoS mitigation. Wyatt T, 2019. 9. 16. 4.0 A few months back, we started using Psychz for our DDoS protection through a GRE tunnel. Their new Chicago PoP was particularly attractive because they were offering a decent blend and good capacity from the start, and they w... 더 많이 보기 ere offering us a good price. Things started off well enough. We paid them for a few hours of their network admins' time just to make sure the setup was done properly. Unfortunately, this was only the start of a number of problems that caused massive quality of service issues for our customers as we deployed the new solution. Essentially, inbound traffic would be served to our full-time mitigated customers through a Psychz GRE tunnel from their Chicago PoP. We expected some overhead going in, and lower speeds than a cross-connect or direct peering, but what we got out of it was entirely ridiculous. Long story short, we were only able to download ~30Mbps through the Psychz Chicago GRE tunnel. Not MB/s, but Mbps - which equates to about 3.7MB/s of actual download speeds through a GRE tunnel purportedly capable of 1Gbps. After weeks of back and forth discussions with staff at all levels of the company, including a personal Skype group with senior management, we weren't able to get anywhere. At one point, one of the managers admitted to giving us false promises on their attempted fixes - in essence, admitting to lying to us. It's also worth mentioning that the ticket staff were entirely worthless - the clearly outsourced support, assuming they ever responded at all, were perhaps the most generic and canned we've ever dealt with. We eventually gave up and set up a GRE tunnel through USDedicated as a temporary solution. This was much better - we're able to push 600-700Mbps through their tunnel without any issues to speak of; much closer to the realistic overhead of a modern GRE tunnel. Because of this, and because of certain information we received from a third party, we can only assume that their newer PoPs are using substandard older-generation hardware to serve GRE tunnels. I sincerely wish we had a better experience with Psychz. I think colocating or renting from them directly is probably a better overall play. But our experience using them as a third party, but closely located, mitigation provider was an - excuse the pun -unmitigated disaster. I believe Psychz is growing and expanding far too fast for their own good. I wish they would focus more of their time and effort on making their current PoPs fantastic instead of offering service in every possible corner of the globe at rock-bottom pricing and, according to our experience, rock-bottom quality. I want to be clear. I want companies like Pscyhz to do well. Mitigation is largely lacking, especially in locations that are relatively underserved like Chicago or Sao Paulo or Singapore, etc. I just wish they would do it a little better. 더 적게 보기	Extremely unhappy customer Jessica Struzik, 2020. 7. 17. 2.8 We will be looking for a new hosting company. We have been with liquid web for years now and at this point we are completely fed up with all of the problems, outages, and the level of support provided.
VPS	아니요	₩17,750에서 ₩112,370까지 4 플랜
4달러 미만	아니요	아니요
8달러 미만	아니요	아니요
$10 이상	아니요	Cloud VPS 2GB ₩15.00 / 월 4.6 14 리뷰 공간: 40 GB 대역폭: 무제한 Cloud VPS 2GB 플랜 보기
전용 서버	₩31,160에서 ₩225,730까지 11 플랜	₩235,380에서 ₩649,360까지 6 플랜
4달러 미만	아니요	아니요
8달러 미만	아니요	아니요
$10 이상	Atom D525 ₩695.00 / 월 0 리뷰 공간: 500 GB 대역폭: 무제한 Atom D525 플랜 보기	Intel Xeon E3-1230v5 ₩199.00 / 월 4.0 6 리뷰 공간: 240 GB 대역폭: 무제한 Intel Xeon E3-1230v5 플랜 보기
클라우드 호스팅	아니요	₩131,270에서 ₩263,270까지 3 플랜
4달러 미만	아니요	아니요
8달러 미만	아니요	아니요
$10 이상	아니요	Standard ₩110.98 / 월 4.4 8 리뷰 공간: 960 GB 대역폭: 10 TB Standard 플랜 보기
Data Centers	6 중 1	6 중 2
북미	예	예
유럽	아니요	예
아시아	아니요	아니요
오세아니아	아니요	아니요
남미	아니요	아니요
아프리카 및 중동	아니요	아니요
기술 지원 서비스	6 중 0	6 중 5
라이브 채팅	아니요	예
전화 고객 지원	아니요	예
이메일 기술 지원	아니요	예
포럼 지원	아니요	아니요
동영상 가이드	아니요	예
지식베이스	아니요	예
CMS 지원	9 중 0	9 중 3
WordPress	아니요	아니요
관리되는 Wordpress	아니요	아니요
Joomla	아니요	예
Drupal	아니요	예
Magento	아니요	아니요
Fantastico	아니요	예
Softaculous	아니요	아니요
PrestaShop	아니요	아니요
Zen Cart	아니요	아니요
운영 체제 지원	2 중 0	2 중 2
Windows / ASP.net	아니요	예
Linux	아니요	예
언어 지원	7 중 0	7 중 7
PHP	아니요	예
Java	아니요	예
Python	아니요	예
Node.js	아니요	예
Django	아니요	예
Perl	아니요	예
Ruby on Rails	아니요	예
데이터베이스 지원	3 중 0	3 중 3
MongoDB	아니요	예
MySQL	아니요	예
PostgreSQL	아니요	예
지불 유형 지원	6 중 0	6 중 3
PayPal	아니요	예
신용카드	아니요	예
Skrill	아니요	아니요
전신 송금	아니요	예
Webmoney	아니요	아니요
Bitcoin	아니요	아니요
	2위	우승자

Psychz Networks vs Liquid Web

Cloud VPS 2GB

Atom D525

Intel Xeon E3-1230v5

Standard

2위

우승자

개인 정보

선택 사항